The Perfect Storm: Exploring The Potential Losses From Poorly-Hedged CRE Exposure
MyEListings' markets and economics editor and creates content about global macro events and their impact on US commercial real estate.
As businesses and workers adjust to remote working arrangements and reevaluate their need for actual office space, the commercial real estate (CRE) market has come under intense pressure, particularly in the office sector. The balance sheets of non-bank financial intermediaries, local banks, and insurance firms are threatened as a result of the decrease in property values and ongoing rise in loan defaults. Due to their extensive exposure to the CRE market, these institutions run the risk of substantial losses as well as systemic problems for the financial industry.
Basel III Framework
Instituted following the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, the Basel III capital framework introduces stricter capital requirements for banks in an effort to resolve difficulties with capital adequacy in the financial sector. Life insurance firms and other non-bank financial intermediaries, however, are not bound by the same rules, making them more susceptible to certain losses, particularly those resulting from their exposure to CRE. Using information from KBF regarding spreads to government securities and the proportion of CRE loans in their portfolios, as well as other sources regarding the lobbying efforts of regional banks to gain financial relief, this paper will explore the possible losses these institutions face.
Financial Intermediaries That Are Not Banks: Commercial Mortgage REITs
| Entity Name | Ticker | Office Exposure (% of Loans) | Liquidity (% of Assets) | Mark-to-Market Liabilities (% of Assets) | Debt/Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. | BXMT | 40% | 7% | 66% | 4.5x |
| KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc. | KREF | 26% | 12% | 24% | 3.9x |
| Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. | ARI | 19% | 2% | 51% | 2.9x |
| Clams Mortgage Trust, Inc. | CMTG | 19% | 6% | 75% | 2.3x |
| Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp. | ACRE | 37% | 9% | 55% | 2.3x |
| Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. | GPMT | 41% | 3% | 44% | 2.4x |
The non-bank financial intermediaries known as commercial mortgage REITs (CMREITs) participate in CRE loans and properties. These institutions are particularly vulnerable to potential CRE market decline because financing and managing CRE assets are at the core of their operations. The heightened risk profile of CMREITs is evident from the G-Spread data on average, with certain spreads exceeding 300 basis points from their corresponding risk-free rate.
CMREITs may suffer extensive losses as a result of the continuous recent decline in property values and the rising possibility of loan defaults. These institutions might not be as well-equipped to absorb these losses as banks as they are not subject to Basel III`s capital requirements, which could cause financial instability and systemic hazards.
Community Banks
| Entity Name | Ticker | Ofc Exp (% of Loans) | Ofc Exp (% of TCE) | CET I | TCE/TTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Marin Bancorp | BMRC | 22% | 135% | 15.0% | 8.2% |
| Community Financial Corp. | TCFC | 21% | 219% | 11.3% | 7.3% |
| Bank OD | OD | 12% | 134% | 11.5% | 13.7% |
| Columbia Banking System, Inc. | COLB | 11% | 95% | 12.9% | 7.0% |
| Umpqua Holdings Corporation | UMPQ | 5% | 69% | 11.0% | 7.8% |
| New York Community Bancorp, Inc. | NYCB | 5% | 61% | 9.1% | 6.4% |
| Signature Bank | SBNY | 5% | 55% | 10.4% | 6.6% |
| Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | CFG | 4% | 47% | 10.0% | 6.2% |
| M&T Bank Corporation | MTB | 4% | 35% | 10.4% | 7.6% |
| Wells Fargo & Company | WFC | 4% | 27% | 10.6% | 7.2% |
Regional banks also have considerable exposure to CRE assets, with several of them making significant loans to regional entities and real estate investors. The heightened perceived risk associated with investing in these institutions is highlighted by the G-Spread statistics for regional banks, with some spreads exceeding 200 basis points.
The regional banks` balance sheets could be severely impacted by the possible losses in the CRE market, endangering their viability and possibly setting off a cascade of events that would affect the entire financial industry, although the potential for this is relatively small. The situation emphasizes the necessity for governments and financial institutions to collaborate in order to address the systemic concerns posed by the CRE market slump as regional banks turn to lobbying efforts to seek financial assistance.
The Insurance Industry
| Company | Ticker | G-Spread | CRE % Domestic Loans | CRE % CET1 Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MetLife | MET | 100 | 5% | 10% |
| Prudential | PRU | 200 | 10% | 20% |
| New York Life | NYL | 150 | 8% | 16% |
| MassMutual | N/A | 170 | 9% | 18% |
| Northwestern Mutual | NWM | 180 | 10% | 20% |
Another category of financial institutions having exposure to the CRE market is life insurance firms, which frequently invest not only in CRE-related assets and loans, but the banks and other institutions that also make these loans themselves. The CRE market may continue to deteriorate despite the fact that life insurance firms often have a more diverse investment portfolio than local banks and non-bank financial intermediaries, and this over-exposure of insurers due to what amounts to a double-dip of risk could prove problematic with time.
The G-Spread data table for life insurance firms offers details on how exposed they are to the CRE market. For instance, Prudential Financial Inc. (PRU) has a G-Spread of 190, whereas MetLife Inc. (MET) has a G-Spread of 175. Although these margins are less than those seen in regional banks and CMREITs, they are nonetheless elevated over baseline, and suggest greater risk today than in the recent past.
Life insurance firms may be impacted by the potential losses in the CRE sector if the value of their CRE investments declines or there are more CRE loan defaults. This might result in poorer profitability, less investment income, and ultimately a negative effect on shareholders and policyholders.
What Do Lobbyists Do For Banks?
Regional banks have turned to lobbying to ask for financial assistance and support from the government as they may suffer significant losses as a result of their CRE exposure. The demand for financial support underlines the severity of the situation and the possibility of further repercussions across the banking industry if it is not resolved.
These lobbying initiatives seek to raise awareness of the difficulties experienced by regional banks as well as any systemic dangers that may arise as a result of the CRE market slump. The interconnectedness of the financial sector and how the losses experienced by regional banks can affect other financial institutions, such as non-bank financial intermediaries and life insurance companies, must be taken into account by regulators.
What Is The Importance Of Controlling Systemic Risk?
It is crucial for financial institutions and regulators to collaborate in order to reduce systemic risks because the risk of huge losses exists among non-bank financial intermediaries, community banks, and life insurance businesses. Appropriate capital requirements for non-bank financial intermediaries and life insurance businesses, improved risk management procedures, and stress testing to evaluate their resilience in the face of a declining CRE market could all fall under this category, as could improved term structures and ad-hoc, prescient lending facilities.
In order to reduce their exposure to the CRE market, financial institutions should consider diversifying their investment asset portfolios, as well as improving hedging activities when markets move. By implementing these, institutions can reduce the potential effects of a further drop in property values and loan defaults.
Additionally, policymakers should implement measures to assist the CRE market, such as specialized financial relief for companies and property developers as well as incentives for brand-new development projects to promote economic growth and stable property values.
Synthesis
Regional banks, life insurance firms, and non-bank financial intermediaries` balance sheets are threatened considerably by the CRE market`s continuing downturn. Systemic concerns for the financial sector could arise from the possible losses experienced by these institutions and their significant exposure to the CRE market.
Financial institutions and regulators must collaborate to develop more effective risk mitigation techniques, such as higher capital requirements, improved risk management procedures, and portfolio diversification standards, to address these issues. The trick, as always, will be doing this without eliminating the risk of loss to investors, something incredibly important to maintain, lest markets become gravy trains, rather than effective allocators of voluntary risk. Commercial real estate represents a backbone of sorts to the economy; to aid in its recovery, regulators could also consider giving affected enterprises particular financial assistance and encouraging new construction projects, to the extent this can be done fairly to all participants. In this way, they can contribute to promoting overall economic stability and reducing the possible effects of the CRE market slump on the financial sector.
Other recent articles
Article Search
Share
All Article Categories
