Specializes in providing actionable insights into the commercial real estate space for investors, brokers, lessors, and lessees. He covers quarterly market data reports, investment strategies, how-to guides, and top-down perspectives on market movements.
This article was updated on 7/18/2023.
Retail shopping centers and malls operate on a simple business model: They first attract “anchor” tenants that provide the majority of traffic and then rent the remaining space to smaller “satellite” businesses.
The logic of this arrangement is that the anchor tenants form the backbone of the retail space ecosystem, and all businesses can mutually benefit from the traffic they draw.
However, the nature of this arrangement means that if one or several of the anchor tenants leave, traffic can diminish significantly for the remaining businesses. This can result in a kind of "spiral" where more and more tenants leave because of lack of traffic, and revenue follows suit.
Commercial real estate tenants understandably want to protect their finances. To that end, co-tenancy clauses are becoming more standard in commercial lease agreements.
A co-tenancy clause is a provision in a commercial lease agreement that provides some relief to tenants in the event that a certain number of tenants leave the retail space. A co-tenancy clause serves as a kind of hedge against an ecosystem breakdown and any accompanying loss of revenue.
Here is a simple example of how this works in the context of a mall: Most malls arrange themselves around specific “anchor” tenants, like Macy's or Nordstrom, with smaller businesses around those. If any of these tenants leave, revenue at other retail locations could consequently fall. So, tenants might try to include a co-tenancy clause that lets them pay less for retail space if tenant occupancy falls.
Landlords typically dislike co-tenancy clauses because they cannot be responsible for the behavior of other tenants. So, if you have commercial space for lease, it's important to know the specifics around how these lease provisions work.
Co-tenancy clauses are often dense bits of legal jargon and have a lot of stipulations and conditions. But the majority share three core parts that make up the legal agreement.
Co-tenancy clauses may include other provisions and conditions, but these three are the most important to understand. They define exactly how and when the tenant can invoke the clause. As such, negotiation on co-tenancy clauses usually focuses on these three parts.
Co-tenancy clauses give tenants more leverage, so it's natural that landlords consider them an additional risk. Co-tenancy clauses may increase the severity of a retail spiral. As tenants pull out of the retail space, more tenants might invoke the clause, further compounding potential losses in rental income.
As such, commercial landlords will include common conditions to reduce risk and carefully outline when tenants can invoke co-tenancy clauses.
One common strategy is to include a force majeure clause. Such a clause can relieve one party of their contractual obligations in the event that there is an unforeseen disruption to normal tenancy. Another common condition on the clause is that the tenant cannot be in default on their lease if they plan to invoke the clause.
Other general strategies include providing adequate time for the landlord to fill any vacancies on the lease or restrict tenants to just one form of relief rather than multiple forms of relief. A final strategy is to limit the relief period to a certain timeframe, after which the tenant has the option to commence paying regular rent or terminate the lease.
From a landlord's perspective, the best way to guard against the risks of a co-tenancy clause is to be as specific as possible about co-tenancy conditions and to provide a timeframe to fill vacancies before you are obligated to provide relief.
Co-tenancy clauses are usually upheld in court, so they are a crucial part of the commercial lease negotiation process. The best situation that works for both parties is an agreement that gives landlords adequate time to fill any vacant retail space while also providing relief to tenants who suffer from reduced store traffic.
Property owners would be best advised to seek the legal counsel of an experienced real estate lawyer to navigate co-tenancy clauses.
Landlords have the advantage here because tenants do not have access to co-tenancy clauses with each other. So, landlords are in a better position to navigate retail waters to prevent exercising co-tenancy clauses. Managing these clauses from a macro perspective is the key to preventing the retail spiral that co-tenancy clauses may cause.
MyEListing is empowering commercial real estate with tools for those looking to buy, sell or lease commercial real estate properties. Search for available commercial real estate in your area today!